It seems all the things I mentioned in my post about "Abstinence only" classes for young children are true. The classes don't teach abstinence only. The private group admits that the class is as was described by the father in this last post.
From the post.....
Using a private advocacy group (Nashville cares) to teach sex education. He felt the private group was a very pro homosexual group with an open agenda to push the alternative lifestyle onto younger and younger children.
He claimed the group presented the anus as an erogenous zone, brought in male and female sex toys into the class, simulated sex acts, showed children how to put a condom on a artificial penis using their mouth and advocated that if a person did not want to have sex with a person then they should provide oral sex to the person.
Now this from the groups own mouth....So to speak
So the agency's staff member put a condom on a plastic model of male genitalia and explained how it would stop transmission of disease during oral sex.
Luther, who developed the curriculum, said other discussions might have made mention of the prostate and its role in male sexual arousal and response.
Of course the father was attacked for being some right wing zealot, lying to cast aspersions on a good group. It seems like the things he mentioned were true. What of the rest? Any denial? No? Any comments from those who claim they teach abstinence only? Department of Education?
I am sure when this comes back up again next year it will be "Another figment of my wild imagination" or "Some crazy thing he found on the web"
0 comments:
Post a Comment
You can post a comment, but keep it clean and on topic or it won't get published. :)