If the dollar has little value, then donate a few.

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Is this the job of government?

As the Tennessee bill saying teachers should stay out of the homosexuality issue altogether is set to advance in the state house, left leaning editors and bloggers are now openly saying they plan to push their agenda in schools.

Children will be taught to endorse the homosexual agenda despite the beliefs of their parents, the managing editor of a homosexual newspaper in Canada has said.
Writing in the online edition of Xtra Vancouver, Robin Perelle blasted parents with traditional beliefs saying “your outdated morals are no longer acceptable, and we will teach your kids the new norms”.

Resilient
Last year it emerged that Stonewall, a homosexual pressure group in Britain, had been sending controversial teacher training packs to some primary schools....


Indoctrinate
Writing on an LGBT blog, Daniel Villarreal said: “I and a lot of other people want to indoctrinate, recruit, teach, and expose children to queer sexuality AND THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT.”

He also said: “We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it.”

He added: “Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?”

4 comments:

  1. How we imprint our young children's minds to respond to sexual stimuli remains ours to mold and to select. Let me say at the outset I have no phobia nor hostility towards adult gay lifestyles or sexuality. What I do have is a concern for the nation's children. Yet, while I tend to believe that homosexuality is largely the result of early childhood imprinting, I do believe we miss the point when it comes to childhood education about the family. To teach children that households of same sex partners are every bit as normal as ones in which heterosexual parents exist is to sanction, or at the very least, promote a righteousness for irresponsible parents.

    The existential circumstance of a child raised within a same sex couple household is one where both, or at least one, of that child's biological parents are not in the picture. This is where I have my issues. I take serious moral objection to an anonymous sperm or egg donation and/or the supporting legal framework where a father or mother have the ability for almost any reason to entirely abrogate, all or any of their responsibility to their offspring. Moreover, I believe that any male or female who would engage anonymously in the commercial practice of selling off their children at (i.e.) $25 per squirt or per/egg should be placed in a barnyard permanently, for all I care. It is an essential amorality I reject and consequently the only tangible question of conscience I raise to the LGBT movement.

    At any time, when I am aware of a child being raised by a same sex couple, my first question becomes; where are that child's biological parents?
    Who's parental responsibility was abrogated? I don't believe that a family, headed by a same-sex couple is inherently detrimental to a child's well being, but I do believe that a child growing into adulthood wondering why another human being so capriciously discarded them, is deeply harmful.

    By simply creating an educational agenda to promote gay rights, without first addressing serious sociological questions of parental responsibility for biological children, is to give sanction to creation of human life in the absence of procreative love. To suggest that this same essential love exists in same sex couple's procreative desires is to ignore what anyone who has spent time with adopted and foster children already knows; that to have one's early life experience be the coldness of parental abandonment, creates an emotional scar which most never lose but which can easily be perpetuated.

    ReplyDelete
  2. NO, it is NOT "normal" in the sense that it is according to either natural or moral law. It would seem that those who strongly attempt to IMPOSE this notion of "normalcy" are nothing more than bullies themselves.

    KM

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you, Senator Campfield, for all you are doing to protect the minds of our children, as we try to bring them up in the way they should go!

    ReplyDelete
  4. WE TOO WOULD LIKE TO THANK SENATOR CAMPFIELD FOR STANDING UP FOR THE CHILDERN. NO, IT IS NOT NORMAL FOR A MAN TO HAVE SEX WITH A MAN OR A WOMAN TO HAVE SEX WITH A WOMAN. IF IT WAS, YOU WOULDN,T HAVE TO TEACH IT TO CHILDREN.

    ReplyDelete

Here are the rules for comments. Know them. Live them.

http://lastcar.blogspot.com/2011/04/rules-for-comments.html?m=1